RAMM welcomes Professor William Gallois from the University of Exeter to our Research Blog. With two colleagues, William visited the stored collections at the museum to study ‘Morning‘ by local artist Isabel Codrington (1874-1943). Here, he shares his thoughts.
If you would like to see this intriguing painting up close it will be on display at RAMM in 2025. ‘A feast for the eyes’ runs 5 April 2025 – 22 Mar 2026.
The work in theory
Isabel Codrington gifted Morning (1934) to the museum. It is a piece which is sufficiently rich that many will find their own sense of meaning in contemplating the work. Looking at sales of her work at auction (for, like many women painters, she occupies no formal place in Art History), one gains the impression that this piece was one of the bolder, more radical and unconventional pictures she exhibited.

More questions than answers
The painting crosses genres, seeming to pose as many questions as it answers. It proffers wonderful mysteries which relate to the artworks which it references (Caillebotte’s floorboards, a shimmering wall which leads to Turner), a sense of uncertainty relating to its subject and its meanings, as well as the running together of still life with the nude, set within a domestic interior.



As such, Morning would seem to exemplify a set of claims made by Rebecca Birrell in her wonderful book This Dark Country: Women Artists, Still Life and Intimacy in the Early Twentieth Century (2021). “Queering” readings of neglected forms and creators, Birrell reveals the manner in which “still life remained a medium through which to explore aesthetics and politics, but to this established repertoire they [women artists] added an exploration of the uneasy relationship between the public and private spheres, gender and value, lived experience and aesthetic form.” A “reversal” thereby took place in the representation of “domesticity” in which a site of repression became a locale of liberation through art.
Looking closer
Is this not, we may wonder, that which we see in Isabel Codrington’s great work? Birrell writes that such pictures were expressive of a “new moral universe [of] freedom of thought, hope and a suddenly boundless aspiration,” of a kind we might imagine to be revealed by stockings strewn across a floor, a dinner of bread, tomatoes and cucumber left uncleared and unstored, a ragged table cloth which served its purpose without connoting propriety, a cheap illustrative calendar from a grocer’s which stands in as a form of interior decoration, as well as a dashing green bonnet whose purple feather speaks of a night’s entertainment in which this figure was very much a subject rather than an object.





Even her sleep, in this “room of one’s own,” seems to speak of freedoms defined by an actor who fashions her own world, whom we may imagined is seen here by a lover, by herself, or simply by us.
RAMM has released this image open access. It is available to download on Wikimedia Commons
Leave a comment
Subject to approval, your name and blog comment will be made public. Any comment replies will also be public. Your email address will never be published. If you wish to contact us privately, please use the Contact form.